Many hyperlinks are disabled.
Use anonymous login
to enable hyperlinks.
Overview
Comment: | Update the stats.wiki page with recent numbers. |
---|---|
Downloads: | Tarball | ZIP archive | SQL archive |
Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | trunk |
Files: | files | file ages | folders |
SHA3-256: |
6dc67e871e152f3a6234f2872408848f |
User & Date: | drh 2018-06-04 02:43:53 |
Context
2018-06-04
| ||
02:49 | Add a "Fossil vs. Git" link to the homepage. check-in: 6d0fcccdd0 user: drh tags: trunk | |
02:43 | Update the stats.wiki page with recent numbers. check-in: 6dc67e871e user: drh tags: trunk | |
2018-06-01
| ||
20:16 | An off-mailing-list patch which fixes the lack of deleted files from /json/timeline/checkin's file list. Thanks to Edgardo Cruz for tracking this down. check-in: cd55efe775 user: stephan tags: trunk | |
Changes
Changes to www/stats.wiki.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 | <title>Fossil Performance</title> <h1 align="center">Performance Statistics</h1> The questions will inevitably arise: How does Fossil perform? Does it use a lot of disk space or bandwidth? Is it scalable? In an attempt to answers these questions, this report looks at several projects that use fossil for configuration management and examines how well they are working. The following table is a summary of the results. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 | <title>Fossil Performance</title> <h1 align="center">Performance Statistics</h1> The questions will inevitably arise: How does Fossil perform? Does it use a lot of disk space or bandwidth? Is it scalable? In an attempt to answers these questions, this report looks at several projects that use fossil for configuration management and examines how well they are working. The following table is a summary of the results. (Last updated on 2018-06-04.) Explanation and analysis follows the table. <table border=1> <tr> <th>Project</th> <th>Number Of Artifacts</th> <th>Number Of Check-ins</th> <th>Project Duration<br>(as of 2018-06-04)</th> <th>Uncompressed Size</th> <th>Repository Size</th> <th>Compression Ratio</th> <th>Clone Bandwidth</th> </tr> <tr align="center"> <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/src/timeline | SQLite] <td>77492 <td>20686 <td>6580 days<br>18.02 years <td>5.6 GB <td>70.0 MB <td>80:1 <td>51.1 MB </tr> <tr align="center"> <td>[http://core.tcl.tk/tcl/timeline | TCL] <td>161991 <td>23146 <td>7375 days<br>20.19 years <td>8.0 GB <td>222.0 MB <td>36:1 <td>150.5 MB </tr> <tr align="center"> <td>[/timeline | Fossil] <td>39148 <td>11266 <td>3971 days<br>10.87 years <td>3.8 GB <td>42.0 MB <td>90:1 <td>27.4 MB </tr> <tr align="center"> <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/slt/timeline | SLT] <td>2384 <td>169 <td>3474 days<br>9.51 years <td>2.1 GB <td>145.9 MB <td>14:1 <td>143.4 MB </tr> <tr align="center"> <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/th3.html | TH3] <td>12406 <td>3718 <td>3539 days<br>9.69 years <td>544 MB <td>18.0 MB <td>30:1 <td>14.7 MB </tr> <tr align="center"> <td>[http://www.sqlite.org/docsrc/timeline | SQLite Docs] <td>8752 <td>2783 <td>3857 days<br>10.56 years <td>349.9 MB <td>16.3 MB <td>21:1 <td>13.57 MB </tr> </table> <h2>Measured Attributes</h2> In Fossil, every version of every file, every wiki page, every change to |
︙ | ︙ |